Measurement of community resilience using the Baseline Resilience Indicator for Communities (BRIC) framework: A systematic review

Camacho, Christine; Bower, Peter; Webb, Tom R.; Munford, Luke

doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103870

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Existing Indices can serve as precious references and inspirations for the development of the proposed composite Index of System-of-Systems Resilience. Within the community resilience domain, specifically, fundamental work has been conducted by Cutter et al (2010), whose baseline resilience indicators for communities (BRIC) constitutes the most replicated quantitative method of measuring community resilience to date (Camacho et al, 2023). However, we observe that applications of the BRIC method thus far have mostly focused on its use as a research instrument, rather than as a support for continuous (design) decision making.…”

Section: Previous Work and Inspirationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring indicators of system-of-systems resilience: outcomes of a health systems design workshop at an international conference

Pannunzio,

Komashie,

Walsh

et al. 2024

Proc. Des. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This contribution departs from an existing model, the Design Framework for Systems-of-Systems Resilience, to explore systems resilience issues across the health, environmental, and economic domains. The reported research activities include 1) a rapid review to collect a set of systems indicators and 2) a design workshop employing causal loop diagramming to map expected causal influences between indicators. Through this exercise, we examine key themes in this research domain and outline directions for further enquiry, while involving members of the design research community in an open dialogue.

show abstract

Section: Previous Work and Inspirationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring indicators of system-of-systems resilience: outcomes of a health systems design workshop at an international conference

Pannunzio,

Komashie,

Walsh

et al. 2024

Proc. Des. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, when summarizing community constituent elements, scholars usually also consider the community’s interactions with the outside world, especially the region in which the community is located. Camacho et al ( 21 ) introduced the concept of the Community Baseline Resilience Index (BRIC) by Cutter, categorizing community constituent elements into infrastructure, ecosystems, institutions, economy, society, and community capital. Using these categories, they developed assessment indicators and quantitatively evaluated community resilience based on publicly available data for specific regions.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

The application of innovative ecosystems to build resilient communities in response to major public health events

La,

Li,

Liu

2024

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, major public health events have had a significant and far-reaching impact on communities. As a response, there has been an increasing interest in enhancing community resilience through innovative ecosystems that involve diverse stakeholders with varying needs and demands. This study investigates the application of innovative ecosystems to improve community resilience in the face of major public health events by utilizing a sequential game approach to balance the interests of government, community, and residents. Subsequently, a comprehensive questionnaire survey was conducted among key stakeholders to ascertain their objectives, requirements and concerns for the innovation ecosystem based on the analysis results of the game model. The reliability and effectiveness of the proposed research method were verified through the analysis and verification of the sequence game model and questionnaire survey results. Finally, according to our analysis results, we propose countermeasures for promoting innovative ecosystems to improve community resilience. The research results indicate that the successful implementation of innovative ecosystems requires consideration of the different needs of stakeholders such as government officials, community members, and residents. Combining these perspectives can effectively promote such systems while enhancing the community’s resilience to major public health events.

show abstract

“…The DROP framework has been constructed to demonstrate the link between resilience and vulnerability and present a holistic evaluation of disaster resilience at multiple scales [17,66,75,76]. Nevertheless, the BRIC assesses intrinsic resilience, also known as pre-event resilience, using six dimensions: socioeconomic, community, financial, institutional, infrastructure and built environment, and ecological [74,77,78].…”

Section: Urban Resilience and Vulnerabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Adaptability; self-organization; diversity; efficiency; independence; multifunctionality; connectivity; productivity Source: the authors (depending on [20,41,[76][77][78]80,84,86,87,89,92,[95][96][97][98][99][100][101]).…”

Section: Self-organization Postdisastersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revisiting Urban Resilience: A Systematic Review of Multiple-Scale Urban Form Indicators in Flood Resilience Assessment

Mabrouk,

Han,

Mahran

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the increasing number of flood studies, the interrelationships between urban form indices (UFIs) and flood resilience (FR) have received little attention and hold miscellaneous perspectives. Consequentially, this study identifies how UFIs at various spatial scales affect FR by synthesizing article findings and proposing insights for future research. Scientometric analysis has been used to analyze the gathered peer-reviewed articles from nine research engines without time restrictions. One hundred and eighteen relevant articles were included and thoroughly investigated using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Our findings indicate that divergent and dialectical perspectives about the efficacy of UFIs are due to multiple disciplines, methodologies, and different case study contexts. The included studies were classified according to urban scale as macro (citywide), meso (districts), micro (block), and multi-scalar analysis by 80.5%, 6.8%, 10.2%, and 2.4%, respectively. Furthermore, the included studies were categorized based on analysis type into realistic case studies, literature reviews, modeling, and hybrid analysis, with 74.6%, 7.6%, 14.4%, and 3.4%, respectively. At the macroscale, city density and spatial distribution degree have the most significant effect on FR. At the same time, mixed uses, connectivity, coverage ratio, block arrangements, and street characteristics are on the meso and micro scales. Further studies on the trade-offs and commonality between UFIs, FR, and overall urban resilience are required to shape climate-adaptive, sustainable communities.

show abstract

Measurement of community resilience using the Baseline Resilience Indicator for Communities (BRIC) framework: A systematic review

Cited by 10 publications

References 39 publications

Exploring indicators of system-of-systems resilience: outcomes of a health systems design workshop at an international conference

Exploring indicators of system-of-systems resilience: outcomes of a health systems design workshop at an international conference

The application of innovative ecosystems to build resilient communities in response to major public health events

Revisiting Urban Resilience: A Systematic Review of Multiple-Scale Urban Form Indicators in Flood Resilience Assessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About