1999
DOI: 10.1007/s002640050367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of cartilage thickness in the human knee-joint by magnetic resonance imaging using a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence

Abstract: We studied human specimens and compared data on cartilage thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging by using an image analysing system with corresponding histological sections in the middle of each sector. The findings are based on 768 measurements in 26 knee joints. Overall, there was very good magnetic resonance/anatomic correlation (r=0.88). The poorest correlation was in the sectors of the femur (r=0.69). The correlation seemed not to be dependent on the grade of osteoarthritic cartilage lesio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cartilage thickness of healthy and osteoarthritic human knee joints varies in the range of 0.5-7.4 mm (KLADNY et al, 1999). With the present method, the haemoglobin absorption peaks could often be seen for thicker cartilage layers (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The cartilage thickness of healthy and osteoarthritic human knee joints varies in the range of 0.5-7.4 mm (KLADNY et al, 1999). With the present method, the haemoglobin absorption peaks could often be seen for thicker cartilage layers (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Comparison of data on cartilage thickness measurements with MRI with corresponding histological sections in the middle of each sector revealed a very good magnetic resonance/anatomic correlation ( r = 0.88) 59 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the recent years, nanofiber nonwovens from electrospinning have been extensively studied . However, such scaffold is too thin that is prone to be a 2D dimension on a macroscale with small pores (<50 μm), whereas the thickness of articular cartilage varies from <500 μm to 7.1 mm and the favorable pore diameter diverse from 100 to 500 μm …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%