1976
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1976.40.1.91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of cardiac output by electrical impedance at rest and during exercise

Abstract: A comparison was made between cardiac output values determined by the dye dilution and electrical impedance methods in ten subjects at rest and during graded exercise on a bicycle ergometer. The cardiac output values determined by the two methods were linearly related and significantly (P less than 0.001) correlated (r = 0.90). Movement artifact associated with exercise at maximum or near-maximum work loads caused severe distortion of the dZ/dt wave form and prevented calculation of impedance cardiac output at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons have been made with a wide range of invasive techniques, e.g. the direct Fick method [15,16], dye-dilution [17,18] and with the technique of CO 2 rebreathing [19,20]. Correlation coefficients between SV measurement using EIC and the reference method ranged 0.87-0.94.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons have been made with a wide range of invasive techniques, e.g. the direct Fick method [15,16], dye-dilution [17,18] and with the technique of CO 2 rebreathing [19,20]. Correlation coefficients between SV measurement using EIC and the reference method ranged 0.87-0.94.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impedance cardiography which reliably detects small changes in stroke volume, (18,19,(22)(23)(24) revealed a significant 8% reduction in stroke volume during small physiologic elevations in plasma AVP. This response is most likely not related to an increased afterload since arterial blood pressure was minimally elevated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that measurement of CO by impedance plethysmocardiography is valid even during exercise and is comparable to other standard methods. 17,18 However, because vigorous body movement considerably increased the noise of impedance, which would introduce error in the SV value, we used the SV value in the recovery phase soon after termination of the exercise. Therefore, the %SVend and %COend measured in the present study might not represent the maximum value of SV and CO during exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%