Measurement of branching ratios and branching fractions of the charmed meson D0

Barlag, S.; Becker, H.; Böhringer, T.; Bosman, M.; Castillo, V.; Chabaud, V.; Damerell, Chris; Daum, C.; Dietl, H.; Gillman, A. R.; Gilmore, R.; Gooch, T.; Görlich, L.; Gras, P.; Hajduk, Z.; Higón, E.; Kelsey, D. P.; Klanner, R.; Kwan, S.; Lücking, B.; Lütjens, G.; Lütz, G.; Malos, J.; Männer, W.; Neugebauer, E.; Pałka, H.; Pepé, M.; Richardson, J.; Rybicki, K.; Seebrunner, H. J.; Stierlin, U.; Tiecke, H.; Waltermann, G.; Watts, S.; Weilhammer, P.; Wickens, F. J.; Wiggers, L.; Witek, M.; Żeludziewicz, T.

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90460-7

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1990

1992

Publication Types

Select...

Article6

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 13 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is the most statistically significant observation of this mode. One previous, low-statistics result has been published [5]. This decay, first observed by the ARGUS Collaboration [12], is Cabibbo allowed but involves the popping of an ss pair.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Unusual decay modes ofD0andD+mesons

et al. 1991

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The backgroundsubtracted mass-difference plot is shown in Fig. 2(a) Fig. 2 Table I). Figs. 1(b) and 1(c). The analysis proceeds in a similar way to that of D -+~+a~+m There is a more restrictive requirement on the D mass (see Table I) because of the narrower signal in this mode, and the x cut is lowered to 0.4 to obtain more statistical precision. There is a further requirement on the dE/dx information of the two tracks designated K's. Fig. 3(a) Table I).Taking those combinations with a mass difference of 0. 1435 -0. 1475 GeV/c, the background-subtracted %+K invariant mass is plotted for the candidates.There is a clear P signal [ Fig. 3(b)]. Furthermore, Fig. 3

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%