1990
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199072090-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of anterior-posterior displacement of the knee. A comparison of the results with instrumented devices and with clinical examination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
2
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
80
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Noble and Erat reported that 20% of their 250 patients who were waiting for a meniscectomy did not need the operation, and of those that were operated on only 73% had significant meniscal abnormalities [20]. We do not advise arthroscopy in all acute injuries, unlike others [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Noble and Erat reported that 20% of their 250 patients who were waiting for a meniscectomy did not need the operation, and of those that were operated on only 73% had significant meniscal abnormalities [20]. We do not advise arthroscopy in all acute injuries, unlike others [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The posterior force recorded on the sheet was 137.9 N at 90°flexion and 134.9 N at 135°(average of three measurements). The posterior force applied to the knees was considered to be approximately 130 N at both flexion angles which was comparable to those of the methods using arthrometers or stress radiographs [5,13,23,26,27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Much of what we know about posterior stability has been obtained using stress radiography and arthrometry for normal knees [5,11,13,23,26,27]. In the case of PCL reconstruction surgery, the tension of the graft is determined commonly by that of the contralateral side assessed by stress radiography or arthrometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, we did not use any instrument to objectively evaluate the medial compartment opening and the external rotation. Literature is still controversial on the correlation between instrumental and manual clinical evaluations [1,23,29,32]. Third, while valgus stress X-rays can provide objective and reproducible measurements of medial compartment gaps [12], the external rotation test currently remains a manual and subjective evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%