2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Adults' Sedentary Time in Population-Based Studies

Abstract: Sedentary time (too much sitting) is increasingly being recognized as a distinct health risk behavior. This paper reviews the reliability and validity of self-reported and device-based sedentary time measures and provides recommendations for their use in population-based studies. The focus is on instruments that have been used in free-living, population-based research in adults. Data from the 2003–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey are utilized to compare the descriptive epidemiology of sede… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
509
5
19

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(566 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
33
509
5
19
Order By: Relevance
“…While the ST question was similar to that included in the validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Craig et al, 2003), single item questions typically underestimate ST (Healy et al, 2011) so estimates of ST are likely to be low. If any underestimation is consistent over time, then changes in ST are likely to be unaffected; however, precise effects of any error and bias cannot be estimated.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the ST question was similar to that included in the validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Craig et al, 2003), single item questions typically underestimate ST (Healy et al, 2011) so estimates of ST are likely to be low. If any underestimation is consistent over time, then changes in ST are likely to be unaffected; however, precise effects of any error and bias cannot be estimated.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they cannot distinguish between sitting and standing still. [13][14][15] In order to report accurately on the relationship between occupational sitting patterns and health outcomes, objective measures that measure postural change are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…behavioural trends and assessing emerging relationships between sitting and health, they may not be sufficiently sensitive for detecting changes in sitting time 3) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%