See related article, pp. 268-277 WHY DO WE WANT TO MEASURE FLOW?Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) at stress and rest in ml/g/min and determination of the myocardial flow reserve (MFR) have long been the domain of PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with tracers such as 15 O-Water, 13 NH 3 -Ammonia, and more recently 82 Rubidium. Although at this time, in the routine clinic, PET are currently primarily analyzed visually or at most, semi-quantitatively for the presence and severity of relative perfusion defects using static perfusion images, the MFR measurements can be readily obtained, by rereconstructing the list mode data. This is in particular true for the new 3D PET/CT systems. Thus, the additional quantitative flow measurements can be obtained without additional imaging time or radiation exposure during PET MPI, and therefore are becoming incorporated in the clinical practice. The additional prognostic value of MFR measurements over standard measurement of ischemia has been conclusively demonstrated in two large studies.1,2 The potential added diagnostic value of flow measurements for improved prediction of obstructive coronary disease has also been suggested. 3,4 WHY DO WE WANT TO MEASURE FLOW WITH SPECT?While blood flow measurements with PET are easy to obtain and well validated, myocardial perfusion SPECT is currently a much more widely used MPI technique clinically. SPECT MPI is also a significantly cheaper modality. SPECT MPI is still used at least 20 times more often than PET in the routine clinical practice in US, according to the recent estimates. If it were indeed feasible to estimate the MBF and MFR from the standard SPECT MPI scan, it would dramatically enhance the clinical dissemination of these measurements.
IS FLOW MEASUREMENT FEASIBLE ON THE CONVENTIONAL SPECT CAMERAS?In this issue of Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, a study by Shershta et al 5 analyzes the feasibility results of dynamic flow measurements with 99m Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT. Several methodological aspects of this study merit highlighting. The authors studied 16 patients with 99m Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT and 13 N-ammonia PET studies obtained within 12-month period (mean 3.3 months). They set aside 9 patients from this dataset to ''train'' the SPECT dynamic quantification by fitting the tracer extraction model to match SPECT and PET results. They subsequently validated the derived SPECT in the remaining 7 cases. The dynamic SPECT scan was performed with a conventional Anger camera with CTbased attenuation correction. To our knowledge, this is the first direct published comparison of SPECT and PET dynamic measurements in humans. Of note, the rotation time of the gantry was 2 minutes. To circumvent this, the authors employed a specialized spatio-temporal reconstruction method developed ''in-house,'' which allowed reconstruction to obtain 5 seconds 3D SPECT frames, despite slow rotation of the gantry. They report the final correlation between the SPECT and PET MBF and MFR values in the 7 patients, which seems to be better for th...