1975
DOI: 10.13182/nt75-a24366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Absolute Fission Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the chambers were determined using 252 Cf sources of known activity, in the same configuration as the reference foils. These measurements gave a fission detection efficiency for both halves of the chambers (up-and downstream) that was consistent with the value reported by NIST [8]. A fission detection efficiency of 98.5% is taken as the fission detection efficiency for the NIST chambers and we have likewise used the same value.…”
Section: Fission Chamberssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficiency of the chambers were determined using 252 Cf sources of known activity, in the same configuration as the reference foils. These measurements gave a fission detection efficiency for both halves of the chambers (up-and downstream) that was consistent with the value reported by NIST [8]. A fission detection efficiency of 98.5% is taken as the fission detection efficiency for the NIST chambers and we have likewise used the same value.…”
Section: Fission Chamberssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The chambers were adopted from the design developed by Gilliam et al at NIST [8]. The two individual FCs are mirror images of each other (as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fission Chambersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3] and they are briefly summarized here. The dual-fission chamber was adopted from the design developed by Gilliam et al at NIST [5]. However, several design changes were made to facilitate the insertion and removal of the activation target contained between the two individual fission chambers (FCs).…”
Section: Experimental Procedure Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8. The experimental reaction cross sections were taken from EXFOR and checked against original publications [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] (they were not corrected for modern monitors or decay data). Some experimental data are spectral indices, i.e.…”
Section: Validation In the Reference Reactor Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some experimental data are spectral indices, i.e. reaction rate ratios measured relative to 235 U(n,f) [21,22,24], 238 U(n,f) [24] and 197 Au(n, ) [25]. The energy-averaged cross sections were computed using IRDFF-1.03 and facility spectra available in IRDF-2002 or one recalculated for ISNF.…”
Section: Validation In the Reference Reactor Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%