1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00095-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of 6-MV X-ray surface dose when topical agents are applied prior to external beam irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the presence of metallic elements may produce secondary radiation on the skin surface, which also increases the skin surface dose. A study by Burch [7], however, that tested a variety of commonly used skin care products and deodorants (some containing zinc and aluminum), concluded that skin reactions should not increase if those agents are applied during treatment and that there is no significant bolus effect with normal use of the products using modern megavoltage radiation therapy equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the presence of metallic elements may produce secondary radiation on the skin surface, which also increases the skin surface dose. A study by Burch [7], however, that tested a variety of commonly used skin care products and deodorants (some containing zinc and aluminum), concluded that skin reactions should not increase if those agents are applied during treatment and that there is no significant bolus effect with normal use of the products using modern megavoltage radiation therapy equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topical corticosteroids in this review ANTICANCER RESEARCH 37: 5343-5353 (2017) 5350 vary from mild to potent and the vehicles used were mainly cream and ointment except in one study where aerosol was employed. The reason for this was to avoid the bolus effect however the increase in surface dose is not significant when a thin layer (<2 mm) of product is applied (43). The maximum application of treatment in the studies included in this review did not exceed twice daily (Table III).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We saw no possible negative effect on the acute skin reactions or on impairment. The recommendation to clean the skin in radiation fields with water is based on the experiences of other authors [4,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Burch et al [4] there is no unwelcome bolus effect of topical agents in the radiation field to be feared. Application of 10% sucralfate in sorbolene creme or application of topical solution containing ascorbic acid had no advantageous effect on acute skin reaction or subjective impairment [6,10,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%