2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement invariance of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) in adolescents and adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there was evidence of scalar invariance across genders based on change in RMSEA and TLI, scalar invariance was not indicated based on change in CFI. These findings are consistent with recent work examining measurement invariance across adolescents and adults [ 20 ] and provide support for similar factor structure and factor loadings across genders; however, there may be variance at the level of the intercepts (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there was evidence of scalar invariance across genders based on change in RMSEA and TLI, scalar invariance was not indicated based on change in CFI. These findings are consistent with recent work examining measurement invariance across adolescents and adults [ 20 ] and provide support for similar factor structure and factor loadings across genders; however, there may be variance at the level of the intercepts (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We first conducted confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) in MPlus version 8 to test the 8-factor structure of the F-EPSI in the overall sample as well as separately in men and women ( H1 ). Consistent with prior research [ 19 , 20 ], we employed a robust weighted least squares estimator (WLSMV), given the ordinal nature of the data. As suggested in the literature [ 33 , 34 ], model fit was assessed using the following indices: root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; < 0.08 indicates a good model fit), the comparative fit index (CFI; > 0.90 indicates an adequate model fit), and the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI; > 0.90 indicates an adequate model fit).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In example 7 of supplementary material, we apply mixture modeling to the attention problems syndrome scale of the CBCL because it is designed to assess attention problems related to ADHD 69,93 and ADHD is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disorder [192][193][194][195] . We find that a two-class, one-factor model provides the best fit to the data.…”
Section: Mixture Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores range from 0 to 220. This measure has strong psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability and an invariant factor structure across development (Forbush et al, 2013; Richson et al, 2021). Higher scores reflect more frequent thoughts, feelings, and behaviors associated with eating disorders.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%