2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10902-016-9795-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Invariance of Personal Well-Being Index (PWI-8) Across 26 Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, both versions (balanced and positively worded) were close to achieving a strong and strict level of invariance with regard to the original version (in English). As in the measurement invariance study performed by Żemojtel Piotrowska et al (2017) , although the CFI difference criterion was not reached, the RMSEA’s was. It is necessary to point out that for measurement invariance analysis Chen (2007) recommends using the thresholds criteria in a supplemented way (not as added conditions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Third, both versions (balanced and positively worded) were close to achieving a strong and strict level of invariance with regard to the original version (in English). As in the measurement invariance study performed by Żemojtel Piotrowska et al (2017) , although the CFI difference criterion was not reached, the RMSEA’s was. It is necessary to point out that for measurement invariance analysis Chen (2007) recommends using the thresholds criteria in a supplemented way (not as added conditions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI), which has been validated in different countries and cultural backgrounds, was selected to measure SWB. The index contains eight different domains: (1) standard of living; (2) personal health; (3) life achievements; (4) personal relationships; (5) personal safety; (6) community connectedness; (7) future security; and (8) religion and spirituality [31]. However, the religion-related items were removed from the SWB, since religion is a sensitive subject in Chinese culture, and less than 10% of the Chinese population is religious [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Утверждения оцениваются по 11балльной шкале (от 0 -«Совершенно не удовле творен(а)» до 10 -«Полностью удовлетворен(а)»). Подробный психометрический анализ этой методики, включая русскоязычную версию, представлен отдельно [ŻemojtelPiotrowska et al, 2017]. Для целей данного исследования формулировки двух утверждений были модифицированы: в утверждение 1 введено пояснение («…своим уровнем жизни (материальным положением)»), а пункт 6 («Своими от ношениями с соседями») был заменен на («Своими отношениями с окружающи ми людьми»).…”
Section: инструменты спектр психологического здоровья (Mhc)unclassified