PsycEXTRA Dataset 2014
DOI: 10.1037/e500122015-055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Invariance of Early Development Instrument across age groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, DIF has been widely used to ensure the internal validity of psychological, educational, and medical quality of life test scores across different demographic variables such as gender (e.g., Zampetakis et al, 2017), ethnic background (e.g., Jones et al, 2016), age groups (e.g., Estabrook et al, 2015), and socioeconomic status (e.g., Thielemann et al, 2018). DIF assesses whether the probability of responding to a specific item is different for different groups after controlling the ability [10,11]. There are two forms of DIF known as uniform and nonuniform.…”
Section: Differential Item Functioning (Dif)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, DIF has been widely used to ensure the internal validity of psychological, educational, and medical quality of life test scores across different demographic variables such as gender (e.g., Zampetakis et al, 2017), ethnic background (e.g., Jones et al, 2016), age groups (e.g., Estabrook et al, 2015), and socioeconomic status (e.g., Thielemann et al, 2018). DIF assesses whether the probability of responding to a specific item is different for different groups after controlling the ability [10,11]. There are two forms of DIF known as uniform and nonuniform.…”
Section: Differential Item Functioning (Dif)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses indicated that the Persian version of the OHI Scale has reliability as a measure of well-being and provided some preliminary evidence of construct validity [7] A brief review of these previous studies on OHI shows the lack of evaluation of OHI fairness/equivalence in measuring happiness among identified groups. Measurement equivalence, also known as differential item functioning (DIF), is an important part of the process of validating questionnaires to test whether the probability of responding to a specific item exhibits different statistical properties for different identifiable groups after controlling the construct being measured [10,11]. Therefore, the goal of this study was to assess measurement equivalence of happiness by means of OHI across gender and marital status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the instrument validation, it is important to ensure the uniformity of assessment across different demographic groups. Such a study is known as measurement invariance (MI) (13). Technically, it is important to test whether the probability of responding to a specific item differs across different identifiable groups after controlling for the construct being measured (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement nonequivalence can occur at different levels such as instrument or item level resulting in noncomparable data across groups [14]. The latter, which is known as differential item functioning (DIF), is an important part of a validation study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, which is known as differential item functioning (DIF), is an important part of a validation study. DIF analysis which originated in educational testing has been used in psychometric studies to assess whether the probability of responding to a specific item exhibits different statistical properties for different identifiable groups after controlling the construct being measured [1, 4]. There are two forms of DIF known as uniform and nonuniform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%