2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement invariance and psychometric analysis of Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale across gender and marital status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total score is the sum of the scores for each item, ranging from 0 to 33, and a score of ≥9 indicates that the respondent has depressive symptoms (validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale). The Cronbach's coefficient of the KADS-11 was 0.84 (32).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total score is the sum of the scores for each item, ranging from 0 to 33, and a score of ≥9 indicates that the respondent has depressive symptoms (validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale). The Cronbach's coefficient of the KADS-11 was 0.84 (32).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The 11-item Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale (KADS-11), a self-reported instrument, was initially applied to a Canadian population (32) to investigate depression. The language of this scale is easy to understand and it can quickly identify patients with depression (32). The items of the KADS-11 are constructed according to the frequency of depressive symptoms and core symptoms of depression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, we tested measurement invariance across the following characteristics: (a) girls versus boys, and (b) depressive versus healthy adolescents. When measurement invariance is established, the fit indicators of the HSC scale model: ΔCFI ≤ 0.01 and ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.015, should not significantly worsen according to every tighter constraint that has been made ( 39 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, there are two types of DIF. The uniform DIF implies constant differences in the probability of responding to an item between groups along the continuum of respondent's knowledge or ability (14). Figure 1 shows an example of the uniform DIF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%