DOI: 10.26481/dis.20170111sh
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement in education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Van Aarsen (2013), the scores on tests from the Cito monitoring system 43 (especially grade 4 -grade 6) are more predictive of actual track placement four years later than the (Cito) End-of-Primary-school test result. Additionally, previous math test scores from the Cito monitoring system across grade four to six correlate highly with the math component of the (Cito) End-of-Primary-school test result (Hirsch, 2017). Assuming at least a temporarily stable student ability, we could therefore attempt to accumulate the results of all or some of these tests and combine these with the End-of-Primary-school test to gain a much richer understanding of the abilities of a pupil.…”
Section: Why Limit Ourselves To a Single Test Result?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Van Aarsen (2013), the scores on tests from the Cito monitoring system 43 (especially grade 4 -grade 6) are more predictive of actual track placement four years later than the (Cito) End-of-Primary-school test result. Additionally, previous math test scores from the Cito monitoring system across grade four to six correlate highly with the math component of the (Cito) End-of-Primary-school test result (Hirsch, 2017). Assuming at least a temporarily stable student ability, we could therefore attempt to accumulate the results of all or some of these tests and combine these with the End-of-Primary-school test to gain a much richer understanding of the abilities of a pupil.…”
Section: Why Limit Ourselves To a Single Test Result?mentioning
confidence: 99%