2012
DOI: 10.1920/wp.cem.2012.4112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement error in nonlinear models - a review

Abstract: This overview of the recent econometrics literature on measurement error in nonlinear models centers on the question of the identification and estimation of general nonlinear models with measurement error. Simple approaches that rely on distributional knowledge regarding the measurement error (such as deconvolution or validation data techniques) are briefly presented.Then follows a description of methods that secure identification via more readily available auxiliary variables (such as repeated measurements, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My instrumental variable approach can be an an alternative strategy to deal with mismeasured endogenous treatment. It is worthwhile because, as mentioned in Schennach (2013), the availability of an auxiliary dataset is limited in empirical research. Furthermore, it is not always the case that the results from auxiliary datasets is transported into the primary dataset (Carroll, Ruppert, Stefanski, and Crainiceanu (2012, p. 10)), Some papers investigate mismeasured endogenous continuous variables, instead of binary variables.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My instrumental variable approach can be an an alternative strategy to deal with mismeasured endogenous treatment. It is worthwhile because, as mentioned in Schennach (2013), the availability of an auxiliary dataset is limited in empirical research. Furthermore, it is not always the case that the results from auxiliary datasets is transported into the primary dataset (Carroll, Ruppert, Stefanski, and Crainiceanu (2012, p. 10)), Some papers investigate mismeasured endogenous continuous variables, instead of binary variables.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Th1 responses are associated with lesion development in bTB, the presence of liver fluke infection could promote a shift towards a Th2‐type immune response and potentially restrain the progression of lesion development. It should be noted that surveillance data have less than perfect sensitivity or specificity in detecting liver fluke (recent European studies suggest sensitivity of 0.63–0.68 and specificity 0.88–1.00; Mazeri, Sargison, Kelly, Bronsvoort, & Handel, ; Rapsch et al., ), which could impact on our inferences here (potentially conservatively biasing our inferences towards the null; Schennach, ). Indeed, similarly, the ability to detect bTB visible lesions at slaughter is less than perfect (though specificity is close to 1; Lahuerta‐Marin et al., ), which is a general limitation to these study types (e.g., Downs et al., ; O'Hagan et al., ; Olea‐Popelka et al., ; Wright et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…With finite samples we may also worry about measurement error bias, although it is not clear how it affects our estimates. In nonlinear models the usual attenuation intuition fails, as discussed in Chesher (1991) and the literature reviewed in Schennach (2013).…”
Section: Estimating the Mtementioning
confidence: 99%