2013
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmm.12.3.033013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement configuration optimization for accurate grating reconstruction by Mueller matrix polarimetry

Abstract: Abstract. Due to the rich information provided by the Mueller matrices when the most general conical diffraction configuration is considered, the Mueller matrix polarimetry has demonstrated a great potential in semiconductor manufacturing. As the configurations of the incidence and azimuthal angles have different influences on the measurement accuracy, it is necessary to select an optimal one among the multitude of possible options. We introduce the norm of a configuration error propagating matrix to assess th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e J a and e J þ x represent the maximum gain factors in the propagation of different error sources, which can be used as objective functions to optimize the measurement configuration of the MMP for more accurate grating reconstruction [30]. In order to make the above description much clearer, the important symbols adopted in the theoretical derivations are listed in Appendix C.…”
Section: Estimation Of Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e J a and e J þ x represent the maximum gain factors in the propagation of different error sources, which can be used as objective functions to optimize the measurement configuration of the MMP for more accurate grating reconstruction [30]. In order to make the above description much clearer, the important symbols adopted in the theoretical derivations are listed in Appendix C.…”
Section: Estimation Of Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly, the resulting precision will be on the order of angstroms such as in [15]. For a fully optimized system measuring silicon fins, this precision is reduced to about 20 picometers as seen in [16]. The structure we propose achieves precision below 10 picometers without optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(22), the systematic error μ Δx inx will be mainly induced by the configuration error Δa if we assume the measurement system is well calibrated and the systematic error μ Δy in y is small. In this case, we can optimize the measurement configuration by [21,25] …”
Section: Data Analysis Revisited From the Viewpoint Of Computational mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that the Mueller matrices measured in proper conical diffraction configurations may help decouple some of the fitting parameters. We further proposed a measurement configuration optimization method for MME to find an optimal combination of the incidence and azimuthal angles, with which more accurate measurement can be achieved [21]. Kim and Li et al investigated the possibility of measuring overlay and grating asymmetry with MME [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation