1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(98)00055-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Characteristics of the Women’s Health Initiative Food Frequency Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
727
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 920 publications
(735 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
727
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear in comparing the two VRs (with and without region) that when the term for region was dropped from this model, virtually all of the variance was attributed to inter-person (subject) sources. Given the overall goal of this research, it is important to note that, within each region separately, we observed a somewhat larger overall standard deviation than typically observed in Western populations using standard FFQ methodology (Holmes et al, 1999;Patterson et al, 1999). In the combined raw data, the standard deviations tended to be intermediate; ie higher than in Kerala but lower than in Gujarat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is clear in comparing the two VRs (with and without region) that when the term for region was dropped from this model, virtually all of the variance was attributed to inter-person (subject) sources. Given the overall goal of this research, it is important to note that, within each region separately, we observed a somewhat larger overall standard deviation than typically observed in Western populations using standard FFQ methodology (Holmes et al, 1999;Patterson et al, 1999). In the combined raw data, the standard deviations tended to be intermediate; ie higher than in Kerala but lower than in Gujarat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Exposure information was collected as soon as possible after diagnosis. Estimates of nutrient intakes from an FFQ are not precise 18,59,60 and there is always the potential for measurement error; however, the FFQ used in our study has been extensively validated in comparison to more extensive methods of measuring dietary intake and biomarkers. 61,62 The 1-year referent period on which exposure data (including dietary intake) was based may not be appropriate to correctly determine associations if dietary intakes over several years is the relevant etiologic time frame.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Dietary information was collected using food frequency questionnaires obtained at baseline and follow-up clinic visits. 14 The questionnaire at follow-up year 3 also included information regarding diet drink consumption over the previous 3 months. Diet drink intake was categorized into nine groups on the questionnaire, ranging from none or less than one per month to more than six drinks per day, with each drink defined as the equivalent of a 12-oz can of beverage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%