Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to review the growing emphasis on quantifiable performance measures such as social return on investment (SROI) in third sector organisations -specifically, social enterprise -through a legitimacy theory lens. It then examines what social enterprises value (i.e. consider important) in terms of performance evaluation, using a case study approach. Design/methodology/approach -Case studies involving interviews, documentary analysis, and observation, of three social enterprises at different life-cycle stages with different funding structures, were constructed to consider "what measures matter" from a practitioner's perspective. Findings -Findings highlight a priority on quality outcomes and impacts in primarily qualitative terms to evaluate performance. Further, there is a noticeable lack of emphasis on financial measures other than basic access to financial resources to continue pursuing social goals. Social implications -The practical challenges faced by social enterprises -many of which are small to medium sized -in evaluating performance and by implication organisational legitimacy are contrasted with measures such as SROI which are resource intensive and have inherent methodological limitations. Hence, findings suggest the limited and valuable resources of social enterprises would be better allocated towards documenting the actual outcomes and impacts as a first step, in order to evaluate social and financial performance in terms appropriate to each objective, in order to demonstrate organisational legitimacy. Originality/value -Findings distinguish between processes which may hold symbolic legitimacy for select stakeholder groups, and processes which hold substantive, cognitive legitimacy for stakeholders more broadly, in the under-researched context of social enterprise.

‘It’s good but it’s not enough’: the relational geographies of social policy and youth mentoring interventions

“…Here, the project was clearly devised using the monetary perspective of cost-effectiveness through involving the third sector and (unpaid) volunteers and a financial analysis (of social return on investment) was an important part of the project's subsequent promotion towards the authorities and funders (cf. Luke et al 2013). The idea of involving local communities in tackling issues previously addressed by statutory agencies also resonates with the direction of the UK government's ongoing programme of austerity and individualisation (Hamnett 2014), although one might also point to some aspects of different political discourse in the devolved administration in…”

Legitimacy and relevance of a performance measurement system in a Finnish public-sector case

“…More specifically, Speklé and Verbeeten (2014) note that in the case of a public-sector organization with complex and ambiguous goals, performance metrics can only provide a partial representation of the organization's ultimate objectives (see also Nørreklit, 2003;Speckbacher, 2003). One such example is an organization that tries to develop its community and provide public benefits, making appropriate performance evaluation difficult (Luke et al, 2013).…”

SROI as a Method for Evaluation Research: Understanding Merits and Limitations

“…If it is the main purpose, however, methods that are less resourceintensive and more geared towards instigating action are probably a wiser choice (cf. Luke et al, 2013). This leads us to our discussion of limitations of SROI analysis.…”