2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and validation of hole-to-hole fuel injection rate from a diesel injector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Below It has started from different approaches to model the injection process in diesel engines, with different objectives, there are some studies that opt for the spray moment flow analysis method, others opt for the analysis of equations already established as eulerian-lagrangian or Navier-stokes, some are more pragmatic and opt for optical analysis such as x-rays, on the other hand there are those who choose an approach from chemical kinetics, a few propose novel approaches such as the large swirl simulation volume method multiphase, but the vast majority is opting for computational flow analysis (CFD) with programs such as ANSYS and AVL BOOST. An example of the first-mentioned approach is the work of Luo [21], in which they make a modeling of each 1 of the orifices of a multi-orifice injector or Long Liu's work [22], which develops a model for the simple and analytical diesel pulverization, which includes the evolution of the spray after the end of the injection. On the other hand there are works that follow the second approach as the work of Amin Yousefi [23] that models different types of injection for heavy services at low loads or that of Madjid Birouk [24] that analyzes the effect of the injection delay on the Emissions, both choose to follow the system of Navier-stokes equations, others like Pang Kar [25] choose to follow a Eurelian stochastic method to know how the ignition flame develops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below It has started from different approaches to model the injection process in diesel engines, with different objectives, there are some studies that opt for the spray moment flow analysis method, others opt for the analysis of equations already established as eulerian-lagrangian or Navier-stokes, some are more pragmatic and opt for optical analysis such as x-rays, on the other hand there are those who choose an approach from chemical kinetics, a few propose novel approaches such as the large swirl simulation volume method multiphase, but the vast majority is opting for computational flow analysis (CFD) with programs such as ANSYS and AVL BOOST. An example of the first-mentioned approach is the work of Luo [21], in which they make a modeling of each 1 of the orifices of a multi-orifice injector or Long Liu's work [22], which develops a model for the simple and analytical diesel pulverization, which includes the evolution of the spray after the end of the injection. On the other hand there are works that follow the second approach as the work of Amin Yousefi [23] that models different types of injection for heavy services at low loads or that of Madjid Birouk [24] that analyzes the effect of the injection delay on the Emissions, both choose to follow the system of Navier-stokes equations, others like Pang Kar [25] choose to follow a Eurelian stochastic method to know how the ignition flame develops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of injection rates among each nozzle holes were conducted on a customized test rig based on the spray momentum flux. Detailed information about the test method and the test bench are presented in the [54][55][56] . The experiment was conducted with the injection pressure of 140MPa and back pressure of 2MPa.…”
Section: Internal Flow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed information about the test method and the test bench are presented in the. 5456 The experiment was conducted with the injection pressure of 140 MPa and back pressure of 2 MPa. Validation was carried out by comparing experimental and simulation injection rates at the exit of each orifice; the comparisons are presented in Figure 7.…”
Section: Experiments Establishment and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, CCVs in dual fuel engines are more prone than in SI and CI engines. The root cause of the CCVs in DF engines has usually been related to non-optimal performance of the diesel injection system (variability in diesel injection pressure, mass flow rate, opening delay, nozzle hole-to-hole variability in diesel injected) [18,19,32], to the amount of trapped NG, stratification of NG in cylinder, mixture movement and to the operating and boundary conditions (charge air pressure and temperature). All these potentially affect the igntion, flame propagation, heat release and emission of the combustion processes and thus lead to higher CCVs than in conventional (SI and CI) engines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%