1987
DOI: 10.1016/0890-4065(87)90018-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and the interpretation of burden in the Alzheimer's disease experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggested that, once the label Alzheimer's was applied, even normal behavior may be interpreted in terms of disease stages (Gubrium & Lynott, 1987;Lyman, 1988Lyman, , 1989.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This suggested that, once the label Alzheimer's was applied, even normal behavior may be interpreted in terms of disease stages (Gubrium & Lynott, 1987;Lyman, 1988Lyman, , 1989.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Gubrium (1986) makes this distinction in his discussion of “disease‐for‐the‐physician” and “disease‐for‐the‐caregiver.” As he suggests, each definition reflects the definer's interest in making sense of the illness within his or her own knowledge base, discourse, and agenda. Thus disease is both detected as well as constructed through medical assessments and, once diagnosed, all behaviors and symptoms are understood through the medical label of dementia (Gubrium and Lynott 1987). Once “symptoms” are medicalized, medical interventions (restraints, pharmacology) can be legitimately employed (Lyman 1999).…”
Section: Illness Self and Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research indicates that formal caregivers do not typically engage in the subtle work of helping individuals find clarity during bouts of heightened confusion, relying on what some describe as harmful shortcuts in behavioral interpretation instead (see Dupuis et al, 2012; Downs et al, 2006; Lyman, 1988; Gubrium & Lynott, 1987). Downs et al (2006), for instance, introduce the concept of ‘diagnostic overshadowing’ to describe the practice in which care staff members tend to see the entirety of the affected individual’s behavior as “attributed to the labeled condition” (240).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%