2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and structural invariance of the US version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) in a large sample

Abstract: The current study strongly supports the use of the US version of the BSS-R to compare birth satisfaction across different groups of women with theoretical and measurement confidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
31
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The BSS-R has been validated and translated into Greek (Vardavaki, Hollins Martin, & Martin, 2015) and a United States (Barbosa-Leiker, Fleming, Hollins Martin, & Martin, 2015) version of the tool, with these studies suggesting excellent validity and reliability. The US version of the BSS-R has recently been used in a large-scale US study (Fleming et al, 2016) and a psychometric evaluation of the data from that study corroborated not only the excellent psychometric properties of the US version, but also its measurement robustness when comparing discrete sub-groups within the sample (C. R. Martin et al, 2016a). A comparison of UK and Greek BSS-R datasets has revealed the instrument to be both conceptually and statistically comparable (C.R.…”
Section: Contrasting Withmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The BSS-R has been validated and translated into Greek (Vardavaki, Hollins Martin, & Martin, 2015) and a United States (Barbosa-Leiker, Fleming, Hollins Martin, & Martin, 2015) version of the tool, with these studies suggesting excellent validity and reliability. The US version of the BSS-R has recently been used in a large-scale US study (Fleming et al, 2016) and a psychometric evaluation of the data from that study corroborated not only the excellent psychometric properties of the US version, but also its measurement robustness when comparing discrete sub-groups within the sample (C. R. Martin et al, 2016a). A comparison of UK and Greek BSS-R datasets has revealed the instrument to be both conceptually and statistically comparable (C.R.…”
Section: Contrasting Withmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Higher scores correspond to comparatively higher birth satisfaction across all subscales and the total score. The BSS-R has been found to be psychometrically robust, valid and reliable, with replication of the underlying three-factor measurement model in both English-language (Barbosa-Leiker et al, 2015; Burduli et al, 2017; C. R. Martin et al, 2016a) and translated (C.R. Martin et al, 2016b;Vardavaki et al, 2015) versions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations