2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and optimization of cutting forces during M200 TS milling process using the response surface methodology and dynamometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, with a change in feed rate value from 0.1 to 0.125 mm/rev, an abrupt increase in the interface temperature is visualized, followed by interface pressure due to the higher load acting on the tool, which obviously increases the pressure and friction between the tool and the workpiece. Similarly, milling forces tend to increase with the increase in the feed rate [36][37][38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, with a change in feed rate value from 0.1 to 0.125 mm/rev, an abrupt increase in the interface temperature is visualized, followed by interface pressure due to the higher load acting on the tool, which obviously increases the pressure and friction between the tool and the workpiece. Similarly, milling forces tend to increase with the increase in the feed rate [36][37][38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors discussed about the importance of recycling the rolling stock equipment to avoid landfill and environmental decay. In addition, in order to enhance the cost, material and energy sustainability during the machining operations, the process design, modelling and optimization of the machining operations and parameters as well as the optimization of the energy consumed during the machining operations have been recommended ( Daniyan et al., 2019c , 2019e , 2020d , 2021 ; Tlhabadira et al., 2021 ). Table 2 presents the summary of the findings in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasible combination of the process parameters was done using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The choice of the RSM was based on its ability to iteratively study the cross-effect of process parameters [33][34][35]. The numerical experimentation comprises a four factor experimental design, which varied at different levels in the following ranges; feed rate (250 − 350 mm/rev), spindle speed (1000 − 3000 rpm), cutting speed (100 − 300 m/min) and depth of cut (0.3 − 0.9 mm).…”
Section: The Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%