1999
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.34.6.1040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and Modeling of Carbon Balance of the Apple Tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
69
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(70 reference statements)
11
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the current hypotheses explaining at least part of the abscission of young fruits is deWcit in the supply of assimilate to young developing fruits, resulting in abscission of weaker fruit (Bangerth 2000). This is supported by the high correlation of model estimates of carbohydrate balance and the sensitivity to chemical thinners (Lakso et al 2006) during a time in which carbon deWcits in the tree are the greatest (Lakso et al 1999). Also, we have found in preliminary unpublished studies that shade eVects on fruit drop can be reversed with trunk injections of sorbitol, the primary translocated photosynthate in apple (Loescher et al 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One of the current hypotheses explaining at least part of the abscission of young fruits is deWcit in the supply of assimilate to young developing fruits, resulting in abscission of weaker fruit (Bangerth 2000). This is supported by the high correlation of model estimates of carbohydrate balance and the sensitivity to chemical thinners (Lakso et al 2006) during a time in which carbon deWcits in the tree are the greatest (Lakso et al 1999). Also, we have found in preliminary unpublished studies that shade eVects on fruit drop can be reversed with trunk injections of sorbitol, the primary translocated photosynthate in apple (Loescher et al 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The diameters of all fruits were measured 3 days before and just prior to the application of the shade cloth, to ensure that all fruit were growing well, and then measured again at 24 and 72 h after the treatment began. The shade treatments were applied 18 days after bloom when the largest fruit diameters averaged 12 mm and the shade was maintained on the trees for 72 h. This stage of fruit development has been shown to be the most responsive to low levels of light intensity (Byers et al 1991) and is the period of most likely carbon supply deWcits (Lakso et al 1999). After measuring diameters of the fruits on the trees at 24 and 72 h with a digital micrometer, fruits of consistent diameters and growth increments for each treatment were identiWed to limit variability in the sampled fruits.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Weld Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The contribution of the various shoot categories to tree productivity is now well documented and, as a general trend, whole-tree yield has been shown to strongly depend on light interception by the spur canopy (CorelliGrappadelli et al 1994;Lakso et al 1999;Wünsche et al 1996;Wünsche and Lakso 2000). This probably arises from both morphological features of short as compared to long shoots, the former having higher leaf to shoot ratios (Lauri and Kelner 2001), and faster carbon exportation capacity early in the season (Sansavini and CorelliGrappadelli 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%