2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and identification of the nonlinear dynamics of a jointed structure using full-field data, Part I: Measurement of nonlinear dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current limitations of the present approach include weaker performance for large forcing amplitudes. These appear, for example, in the BRB experiments of [ 7 , 8 ], which we expect to capture only with a more refined forced-reduced dynamics and improved calibration procedures. The same requirement holds for more complicated forcing types (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Current limitations of the present approach include weaker performance for large forcing amplitudes. These appear, for example, in the BRB experiments of [ 7 , 8 ], which we expect to capture only with a more refined forced-reduced dynamics and improved calibration procedures. The same requirement holds for more complicated forcing types (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brake–Reuss beam (BRB) is a benchmark system in the study of jointed structures [ 7 , 8 , 83 ]. In our study, it consists of two 304 stainless steel beams assembled with a lap joint, as shown in figure 4 a .…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29,30 Instead of using the unique marker, some speckle pattern can also be created to determine the motion of cable hangers using digital image correlation (DIC). [31][32][33] But these techniques are not completely non-contact as it involves painting speckles or mounting markers on the structure. Some of the completely non-contact video-based cable response measurement techniques proposed recently are based on optical flow technique 34 and robust subpixel orientation code matching (OCM) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies use the optical flow‐based methods to track a unique marker attached to stay cables to estimate the cable response 29,30 . Instead of using the unique marker, some speckle pattern can also be created to determine the motion of cable hangers using digital image correlation (DIC) 31–33 . But these techniques are not completely non‐contact as it involves painting speckles or mounting markers on the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%