2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.85.1622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and Cancellation of the Cold Collision Frequency Shift in an87RbFountain Clock

Abstract: We measure a cold collision frequency shift in an 87Rb fountain clock that is fractionally 30 times smaller than that for Cs. The shift is -0.38(8) mHz for a density of 1.0(6)x10(9) cm(-3). We study the cavity pulling of the atomic transition and use it to cancel the cold collision shift. We also measure the partial frequency shifts of each clock state finding 2(lambda(10)-lambda(20))/(lambda(10)+lambda(20)) = 0.1(6).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
87
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out in the first paper observing the cold collision shift in 133 Cs fountains [12], selecting atoms in the clock levels using microwaves may lead to distortions of the position or velocity distribution. Methods to cope with these effects have been proposed [8], yet the linear extrapolations have proved to be valid only at the 5% to 10% level.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As pointed out in the first paper observing the cold collision shift in 133 Cs fountains [12], selecting atoms in the clock levels using microwaves may lead to distortions of the position or velocity distribution. Methods to cope with these effects have been proposed [8], yet the linear extrapolations have proved to be valid only at the 5% to 10% level.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequency comparison between two fountains exhibits a stability of 2 10 −16 at 50 000 second averaging time, for the first time for atomic standards. This frequency resolution sets the stage for clock accuracy at the 10 −16 level for cesium, almost one order of magnitude potential gain, and even better for rubidium with its far reduced collision shift [7,8]. We begin by recalling the basic operation of fountain atomic clocks and introduce several new techniques which demonstrate frequency measurements with a frequency resolution at the 10 −16 level.…”
Section: Atomic Fountainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations