2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and analysis of vibrations in a residential building constructed on an elevated metro depot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, because of the uncertainty of the numerical model parameters, additional runs may be required to establish the sensitivity of the predictions to variations in different model parameters. To reduce computing time, a lot of studies have been carried out to simplify and optimize the modeling for finite and boundary element models (Galvín and Domínguez, 2009;Sheng et al, 2006;Verbraken et al, 2011), 2.5 dimensions finite element models (François et al, 2010;Liang et al, 2017), finite difference models (Katou et al, 2008), dynamic stiffness matrix methods (Guo et al, 2017), semianalytical models (Sheng et al, 2004) and theoretical models (Cao et al, 2017(Cao et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, because of the uncertainty of the numerical model parameters, additional runs may be required to establish the sensitivity of the predictions to variations in different model parameters. To reduce computing time, a lot of studies have been carried out to simplify and optimize the modeling for finite and boundary element models (Galvín and Domínguez, 2009;Sheng et al, 2006;Verbraken et al, 2011), 2.5 dimensions finite element models (François et al, 2010;Liang et al, 2017), finite difference models (Katou et al, 2008), dynamic stiffness matrix methods (Guo et al, 2017), semianalytical models (Sheng et al, 2004) and theoretical models (Cao et al, 2017(Cao et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field measurement is recognized to be the most effective method to determine the train-induced vibration. A great number of field measurements have been performed to understand the vibration characteristics in the tunnel or on the ground surface [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. For example, Liu et al [19] measured the vibration accelerations of different track patterns in the metro tunnel and compared their discrepancy in vibration reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zou et al [20] measured the vibrations of ground surface and nearby buildings in the metro depot and also analyzed the changes of acceleration, vibration frequency, and sound level. Cao et al [21] measured the vibration in a residential building on an elevated metro depot; moreover, large-scale international tests were conducted in Europe to analyze the characteristics and uncertainties in the ground-borne vibration [19]. Besides, some researchers adopted the field vibration test to verify the feasibility of a 2.5D FE-BE model based on the field measurement data [10,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cao et al. 7 presented vibration tests in a seven-storey residential building constructed on an elevated metro depot, noting that even though the train speed was as low as 5 km/h, the vibration levels of the bottom two floors exceeded the limit value, and this case was especially obvious for the track located just above the test area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%