2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.480991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and analysis of molecular hyperpolarizability in the two-photon resonance regime

Abstract: The frequency dependent hyperpolarizability of typical donor–acceptor organic nonlinear optical molecules is commonly represented by a nonresonant two-level model, first presented by Oudar and Chemla. We discuss how this model can be extended into the resonant regime, including cases where the molecular transition is described by an inhomogeneously broadened peak. A resonant measurement of hyperpolarizability by electric field induced second harmonic generation (EFISH) is demonstrated, as well as the more conv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is observed that b increases much less upon going from 1.550 lm to 1.064 lm for 1a than for 2a and 3a. This behaviour cannot be explained by the difference in resonance conditions (values of k eg relative to 532 nm: 1a is closer to resonance than 3a), within the TLM, not even if homogeneous damping [31] is taken into account. Clearly, near to resonance the dispersion of the b values of compounds 1a-3a is not well described by this simple model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is observed that b increases much less upon going from 1.550 lm to 1.064 lm for 1a than for 2a and 3a. This behaviour cannot be explained by the difference in resonance conditions (values of k eg relative to 532 nm: 1a is closer to resonance than 3a), within the TLM, not even if homogeneous damping [31] is taken into account. Clearly, near to resonance the dispersion of the b values of compounds 1a-3a is not well described by this simple model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The deshielding observed for the complexes containing L1 and L2 derivatives are lower than those found in the related p-benzonitrile complexes [10,28], which can be a result of the enhanced p-backdonation in the present compounds with thiophene ligands. 31 P NMR data of the complexes showed the expected deshielding of the phosphines upon coordination. The dppe ligand was characterized by a singlet and (+)-diop by two doublets due to its inequivalent phosphorus atoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the excited state transition moments and energies for many states are often needed to accurately calculate the dispersion of the hyperpolarizability [33,34] and there are wellknown problems associated with extrapolating β 0 to zero frequency. [35,36] Even when only two electronic states dominate the response, the damping correction must be carefully taken into account [37,38] and vibronic overtones may complicate the analysis. [39,40] Secondly, there is nothing intrinsic about β 0 as we can argue from the fact that it can be large for very different underlying reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robert J. Kruhlak is at the Department of Physics, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ E-mail: r.kruhlak@auckland.ac.nz Mark G. Kuzyk is at the Department of Physics, Washington State University Pullman, Washington 99164-2814 E-mail: kuz@wsu.edu Dirk et al [3] and Berkovic et al [4] showed that it was important to take damping into account by using a complex energy in the Orr and Ward SOS expression even when considering off-resonance susceptibilities. The distribution of molecules, when embedded in a polymer, are randomly perturbed by virtue of the fact that each molecule experiences a different local environment due to microscopic inhomogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%