DOI: 10.31274/etd-180810-747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement agreement of FITNESSGRAM aerobic capacity and body composition standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…common to 2011-12 and 2012-13 and the one-mile run test is used by some schools across the entire sample window, it seems likely that the unreliable observations in 2011-12 are primarily an issue of accidental half-counting by coaches administering the test for the first time. This is consistent with the findings of Blasingame (2012) that differences between one-mile run and the PACER test and between FitnessGram versions 8 and 9 are minimal.…”
Section: Healthsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…common to 2011-12 and 2012-13 and the one-mile run test is used by some schools across the entire sample window, it seems likely that the unreliable observations in 2011-12 are primarily an issue of accidental half-counting by coaches administering the test for the first time. This is consistent with the findings of Blasingame (2012) that differences between one-mile run and the PACER test and between FitnessGram versions 8 and 9 are minimal.…”
Section: Healthsupporting
confidence: 92%