1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02661384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measured In-plane hole drift and hall mobility in heavily-doped strained p-type Si1−xGex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result is M 00/210=0.48. This value compares favorably with those we found in the literature: 0.47 for a strained Ge~Si~_x layer with x=0.08 and a doping concentration of 2• 10 j' cm -~ [11], and -4/.45 for a strained layer with x=0.12 and a doping concentration of 1-2 • 10 t~ cm ~ [10]. Using 0.48 for rh and the measured value of the sheet Hall mobility (-80 cm"/Vs), the sheet value of the drift mobility, ~d, of about 170 crn2/Vs is obtained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result is M 00/210=0.48. This value compares favorably with those we found in the literature: 0.47 for a strained Ge~Si~_x layer with x=0.08 and a doping concentration of 2• 10 j' cm -~ [11], and -4/.45 for a strained layer with x=0.12 and a doping concentration of 1-2 • 10 t~ cm ~ [10]. Using 0.48 for rh and the measured value of the sheet Hall mobility (-80 cm"/Vs), the sheet value of the drift mobility, ~d, of about 170 crn2/Vs is obtained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, those studies don't include the electrical behavior of implanted dopants in GeSi even though an anomalous electrical behavior of p-type doped strained GeSi was reported before [10,11]. Cams and McGregor observed that in strained GeSi layers which were heavily doped by elemental B during molecular beam epitaxy, the Hall mobility of holes, lab, is lower than the drift mobility, ~t~, in the strained layers [10,11]. This difference becomes greater with increasing Ge content in the layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For this study, we used a set of dedicated test samples consisting of 20 nm thick epitaxially grown Si and SiGe layers, in situ doped with boron (from 1 × 10 18 cm −3 to 1 × 10 20 cm −3 ). By comparing experimental Hall values with average calculated values based on the dopant concentration profiles measured by SIMS, we determined a scattering factor of 0.75 for holes in Si and values ranging from 0.4 to 0.35 for holes in SiGe with a Ge content of 22 atom % and 30 atom %, respectively, in perfect agreement with literature (Figure S6, Supporting Information File 1 ) [ 33 35 ].…”
Section: Development Of Etching Processes For Si 1− supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Scattering correction must be accounted for when extracting Hall effect parameters. The measured values of Hall carrier concentration and Hall mobility are therefore corrected by using the Hall scattering factor, r H , [ 33 35 ] which depends on the studied material, i.e., on Ge content, doping type and concentration. For this study, we used a set of dedicated test samples consisting of 20 nm thick epitaxially grown Si and SiGe layers, in situ doped with boron (from 1 × 10 18 cm −3 to 1 × 10 20 cm −3 ).…”
Section: Development Of Etching Processes For Si 1− mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have not compared our simulations with experimental results since there is a noticeable dearth of experimental results for undoped strained SiGe. Experimental results for heavily doped strained layers [18][19][20] suffer from large experimental uncertainty making quantitative comparison impossible. The 'in-plane' mobility shows the highest mobility in agreement with other published data [2,3] which is important for MOSFET operation since this represents the direction along the channel.…”
Section: Transport Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%