1985
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1985.1096195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measured Frequency Diversity Improvement for Digital Radio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Space diversity in its most common form provides a protection channel for every working channel (1×1 protection) on a per-hop basis. Frequency diversity usually provides one or two protection channels for m working channels (1×m or 2×m protection) on the basis of switching sections that can contain as many as 10 hops in extreme cases [16], [17].…”
Section: Comparison Of Space and Frequency Diversitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space diversity in its most common form provides a protection channel for every working channel (1×1 protection) on a per-hop basis. Frequency diversity usually provides one or two protection channels for m working channels (1×m or 2×m protection) on the basis of switching sections that can contain as many as 10 hops in extreme cases [16], [17].…”
Section: Comparison Of Space and Frequency Diversitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, we could employ frequency diversity techniques [10,11], where different replicas of the intended signal are transmitted at different frequency bands. With these techniques it is easy to have a large diversity order, with almost uncorrelated channels, provided that their frequency separation is much higher than the coherence bandwidth of the propagation channel (for broadband wireless systems, the channel is usually strongly frequency selective and the coherence bandwidth can be a small fraction of the symbol rate).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%