The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.91.010501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measured atomic ground-state polarizabilities of 35 metallic elements

Abstract: Advanced pulsed cryogenic molecular beam electric deflection methods involving position-sensitive mass spectrometry and 7.87 eV ionizing radiation were used to measure the polarizabilities of more than half of the metallic elements in the periodic table for the first time. Concurrent Stern-Gerlach deflection measurements verified the ground state condition of the measured atoms. Comparison with state-of-the-art calculations exposes significant systematic and isolated discrepancies throughout the periodic table. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As one can notice for the ground-level scalar polarizability, agreement is good between the different theoretical results and with the new experimental one (for which we do not have any numerical value [63]). The tensor static polarizability is much smaller than the scalar one in all sources.…”
Section: Dynamic Dipole Polarizabilitysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As one can notice for the ground-level scalar polarizability, agreement is good between the different theoretical results and with the new experimental one (for which we do not have any numerical value [63]). The tensor static polarizability is much smaller than the scalar one in all sources.…”
Section: Dynamic Dipole Polarizabilitysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Ag [119,122] S, 4d 10 52.2 R, PP, QCISD(T) [41,120] S, 4d 10 52.46 ± 0.52 R, DK, CCSD(T) [117] S, 4d 10 36.7 R, DK, CCSD(T) [121] S, 4d 10 55.2 Semi-empirical [120] S 1/2 , 4d 10 55.3 ± 0.5 R, DK, CCSD(T) [149] S 1/2 , 4d 10 46.17 CICP [73] S 1/2 , 4d 10 45.9 ± 7.4 exp. [82] S 1/2 , 4d 10 63.1 ± 6.3 exp.…”
Section: ± 05 Recommended 30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the data are not experimental values as indicated, but from LDA calculations of Doolen, which are listed here as well. 5 78 ± 20 R, Dirac, LDA [110] S, 3d 5 95 ± 15 NR, MCPF [117] S 3 , 3d 5 78.4 ± 7.8 DK, CASPT2 [56] S 3 , 3d 5 83.2 R, CCSD(T) [88] S, 3d 5 60.7 SIC-DFT [73] S 3 , 3d 5 S, 3d 10 53.44 NR, MCPF [119] S 1/2 , 3d 10 45.0 R, PP, QCISD(T) [41,120] S 1/2 , 3d 10 46.50 ± 0.35 R, DK, CCSD(T) [117] S 1/2 , 3d 10 40.7 ± 4.1 R, DK, CASPT2 [112] S 1/2 , 3d 10 43.7 ± 4.4 R, DK, MRCI [121] S, 3d 10 51.8 semi-empirical [122] S 1/2 , 3d 10 46.98 R, DK, CCSD(T) [88] S 1/2 , 3d 10 39.5 SIC-DFT [3,123] S 1/2 , 3d 10 41.65 CICP [124] S 1/2 , 3d 10 42.6 B3LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ [82,93] S 1/2 , 3d 10 54.7 ± 5.5 exp. [73] S 1/2 , 3d 10 58.7 ± 4.7 exp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to 58.7 a.u., with 58.6 ± 4.7 a.u. being the experimental value 15 . The smaller value for the dimer relative to the free atom could well be a result of the minimal basis set used, which prevents polarization of individual atoms.…”
Section: B Bond Length Of Copper Dimer Under Applied Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%