2017
DOI: 10.1121/1.5003786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measured and modeled acoustic propagation underneath the rough Arctic sea-ice

Abstract: A characteristic surface duct beneath the sea-ice in the Marginal Ice Zone causes acoustic waves to be trapped and continuously interact with the sea-ice. The reflectivity of the sea-ice depends on the thickness, the elastic properties, and its roughness. This work focuses on the influence of sea-ice roughness on long-range acoustic propagation, and on how well the arrival structure can be predicted by the full wave integration model OASES. In 2013, acoustic signals centered at 900 Hz were transmitted every ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In September 2013, an acoustic propagation experiment UNDER‐ICE was carried out in Fram Strait (marked in Figure 11a) as part of the Waves‐in‐Ice Forecasting for Arctic Operators project (Geyer et al., 2016; Hope et al., 2017). In this experiment, an acoustic source was located 90 m below the surface.…”
Section: Application Of the Acoustic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In September 2013, an acoustic propagation experiment UNDER‐ICE was carried out in Fram Strait (marked in Figure 11a) as part of the Waves‐in‐Ice Forecasting for Arctic Operators project (Geyer et al., 2016; Hope et al., 2017). In this experiment, an acoustic source was located 90 m below the surface.…”
Section: Application Of the Acoustic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was able to account for scattering at the icewater interface and the conversion of compressional energy to shear energy, but only for range-independent problems. This model has provided accurate predictions of arrival times for recent tomography measurements in the Fram Strait (Hope et al 2017). Gavrilov and Mikhalevsky (2006) used a normal mode propagation code to demonstrate that the ACOUS tomographic signals likely contained information on the ice thickness, though the range-dependent environment added uncertainty to the result.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sound speed profile shown in Figure 2 ) , with ρ ice = 0.9 kg/dm 3( [11] ) . The sound speed model and choice of elastic parameters is based on the model described in Hope et al [5]. For the Fram Strait area in early autumn a mean ice-thickness of 2 m would be more realistic [3], but this would lead to almost total reflection at the ice interface [4,5] for this source depth, and a ice thickness of 10 m is used here to better illustrate how the sound interacts with the ice.…”
Section: Full Wavefield Simulation Of Under-ice Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sound speed model and choice of elastic parameters is based on the model described in Hope et al [5]. For the Fram Strait area in early autumn a mean ice-thickness of 2 m would be more realistic [3], but this would lead to almost total reflection at the ice interface [4,5] for this source depth, and a ice thickness of 10 m is used here to better illustrate how the sound interacts with the ice. The sea-floor is a partially reflecting interface at 2000 m, with c p = 2500 m/s, c s = 1500 m/s, α p = α s = 0.5 dB / Λ, and ρ = 2.9 kg / dm 3 .…”
Section: Full Wavefield Simulation Of Under-ice Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%