2007
DOI: 10.1577/t05-300.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measure Twice, Estimate Once: Pacific Salmon Population Viability Analysis for Highly Variable Populations

Abstract: Abstract.-Because many stocks of Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. are listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA), research has focused on predicting the future population dynamics for these low-abundance stocks. One method used to make predictions is known as population viability analysis. Pacific salmon populations exhibit much higher apparent variability than other ESA-listed vertebrates, and high variability increases the probability of extinction. If the high variability is primarily due to countin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential error sources for escapement-based PSM estimates include undercounts or overcounts at counting stations (Boggs et al 2004), incorrect identification of sex, annual variability in male : female ratios (Murdoch et al 2010), unreported catch, and redd count errors. Redd count inaccuracies may result from observer error (Dunham et al 2001;Paulsen et al 2007), variation in the number of redds per female, low detection rates due to high flows or turbidity (Gallagher and Gallagher 2005), and inaccuracies related to sampling frequency or site selection (Isaak and Thurow 2006). Additionally, if escapement estimates are made downstream along the migration route, escapementbased PSM estimates likely include some en route mortality and, thus, systematically overestimate PSM compared to carcassbased PSM estimates.…”
Section: Carcass-based Psm Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential error sources for escapement-based PSM estimates include undercounts or overcounts at counting stations (Boggs et al 2004), incorrect identification of sex, annual variability in male : female ratios (Murdoch et al 2010), unreported catch, and redd count errors. Redd count inaccuracies may result from observer error (Dunham et al 2001;Paulsen et al 2007), variation in the number of redds per female, low detection rates due to high flows or turbidity (Gallagher and Gallagher 2005), and inaccuracies related to sampling frequency or site selection (Isaak and Thurow 2006). Additionally, if escapement estimates are made downstream along the migration route, escapementbased PSM estimates likely include some en route mortality and, thus, systematically overestimate PSM compared to carcassbased PSM estimates.…”
Section: Carcass-based Psm Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate population or group abundance estimates and uncertainty accounting for observation and process error can be particularly important when estimates are used for management and conservation decisions, such as population viability analyses (Paulsen et␣al. 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computing trends using raw spawner count data is problematic given the counts represent only a single life stage (spawning adults) and are therefore not a representative sample of the entire population. Further, escapement data are prone to an unknown but high degree of random observer error (e.g., due to incomplete census information, age-structure variation, methodological limitations, and other factors [44] [46] ). Given this, we transformed each data series of length l years (where l = 15 yrs) to one comprised of 4-year running averages and a length l -3 (i.e., 12 yrs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%