2011
DOI: 10.1521/siso.2011.75.2.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Measure Them Right”: Lorraine Hansberry and the Struggle for Peace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Money in the play is also viewed as negative because of its connection to capitalism which opposes Hansberry’s communist views. Lieberman (2011) believes that “Hansberry’s interest in and activities on behalf of peace reflect her ties to the Communist left during the early years of the Cold War” (p. 207). In the play, Beneatha says that George is “shallow,” and when Ruth asks her “what do you mean he’s shallow?” Beneatha answers that “[h]e’s Rich !” (Hansberry, 1994, p. 505).…”
Section: Symbolism and The Contingency Of Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Money in the play is also viewed as negative because of its connection to capitalism which opposes Hansberry’s communist views. Lieberman (2011) believes that “Hansberry’s interest in and activities on behalf of peace reflect her ties to the Communist left during the early years of the Cold War” (p. 207). In the play, Beneatha says that George is “shallow,” and when Ruth asks her “what do you mean he’s shallow?” Beneatha answers that “[h]e’s Rich !” (Hansberry, 1994, p. 505).…”
Section: Symbolism and The Contingency Of Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He was blacklisted and attacked from all sides, with the white press calling him a traitor, the Black press denying that he spoke for Black people, and the Cold War state apparatus discussing whether such statements were grounds for the forfeiture of his citizenship (Merriweather 2002). Given this backlash, liberal peace and civil rights organizations began to expel and exclude communists and “fellow travelers” like Robeson, to omit policies and platforms that might be construed as communist, and to mute any criticism of U.S. foreign policy that contravened Cold War statist pedagogy (Lieberman 2011). The fact that liberal Black leaders and organizations felt compelled to disassociate themselves from Robeson—who had never admitted membership in the CPUSA—and those like him, and to enshrine their programs in patriotic nationalism, underscores that the conjuncture of Blackness, radicalism, internationalism, and peace activism was anathema to the U.S.…”
Section: Radical Black Peace Activism As National Security Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%