Measurable outcomes of consumer engagement in health research: A scoping review

Abstract

BackgroundConsumer engagement is increasingly recognized as an instrumental component of health research, with many institutions and international bodies mandating it as part of the research and funding process. Given an increasing utilization of consumer engagement in health research, it is critical to identify the literature which support its value and tools that capture successful outcomes. To develop an overview of the literature, we conducted an umbrella scoping review exploring important outcomes of consumer engagement in health research combined with a scoping review of relevant frameworks. Specifically, we aimed to capture outcomes which reflect authentic and meaningful consumer engagement.MethodsFour databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library) were searched using key search terms. Records were included if they were review articles or frameworks that addressed outcomes of consumer engagement in health research. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and an inductive qualitative content analysis. Identified outcomes were sorted based on the three most relevant stakeholder groups (consumer, researcher, institution).ResultsA total of twenty articles that explored a variety of health disciplines were included. We identified fifteen measurable outcomes of consumer engagement in health research. Eight core outcomes were relevant to all stakeholder groups, and were considered fundamental to authentic consumer engagement including (1) trust, (2) empowerment, (3) respect, (4) confidence in the outcomes of the research, (5) transparency of the research process, (6) satisfaction with the consumer engagement program, (7) knowledge and experiences of consumers, and (8) degree of consumer engagement. Outcomes pertaining to specific stakeholder groups included representativeness and diversity of the consumer groups, research relevance to consumers, funding opportunities, quality/validity of the research, recruitment/retention rates, translation and dissemination of research, and interpretation of results.ConclusionThis review identified key measurable outcomes that could be captured when evaluating the impacts of consumer engagement on health research and the success of consumer engagement programs. All outcomes identified were relatively underexplored within the literature, and inadequately and/or inconsistently evaluated amongst studies. Future research should consult all stakeholder groups to identify outcomes perceived to be reflective of optimal consumer engagement.

Exploring Consumers’ Motivations and Experiences of Engaging as Partners in Cancer Research

“…Developing an effective research partnership requires a genuine attempt at relationship building [ 34 ] and acknowledgement of the expertise of both parties [ 30 ]. Meaningful ongoing communication strongly underpinned the results as a key factor for successful research partnerships and has been described previously in other therapeutic areas [ 30 , 31 ]. Consumers are commonly engaged at the beginning of research but rarely in the execution or translation phases [ 12 , 35 ].…”

Development of a consumer involvement strategy for a small university‐based musculoskeletal research centre

“…From a research and funding organisation perspective, it is recognised as important to assess the research impacts/outcomes resulting from consumer involvement to demonstrate the value and return on investment of including consumers in the research process (Esmail et al., 2015 ). Potential indicators of the impact/outcomes of consumer involvement on research include funding opportunities, recruitment/retention rates, translation/dissemination of research results, and research relevance, as well as broader downstream impacts such as health outcomes, changes in health service utilisation, and cost savings (DeBortoli et al., 2022 ). Although a rapid review of existing tools identified four potential options to measure the impact/outcomes of consumer involvement on health research outcomes in Australia (AHRA, 2021 ), we found that these tools were not suitable for our specific context.…”

A holistic pathway to biosensor translation

“…It includes patients or potential patients, carers, health practitioners, and the wider community. 50,51 Ideally the consumers engaged with will be diverse to enable universal design principles to be followed, including people of different ages, sexes, ethnicities, and socioeconomic cohorts; disabled and/or neurodivergent people; people whose first language is not the dominant language in the country of research; people who are indigenous, or experience racial discrimination; people who identify as part of the LGBTIQA+ community; and those who live in non-metropolitan areas.…”