2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6822(02)00026-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measles virus suppresses interferon-α signaling pathway: suppression of Jak1 phosphorylation and association of viral accessory proteins, C and V, with interferon-α receptor complex

Abstract: To establish infections, viruses use various strategies to suppress the host defense mechanism, such as interferon (IFN)-induced antiviral state. We found that cells infected with a wild strain of measles virus (MeV) displayed nearly complete suppression of IFN-alpha-induced antiviral state, but not IFN-gamma-induced state. This phenomenon is due to the suppression of IFN-alpha-inducible gene expression at a transcriptional level. In the IFN-alpha signal transduction pathway, Jak1 phosphorylation induced by IF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
113
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If these antiviral mechanisms are induced by MV-Edm infection, they will serve to amplify the difference in selectivity conferred by the role of CD46 density in regulating CPEs. However, MV-Edm encodes V and C viral proteins that can respond to the host defense by antagonizing IFN-␣/␤ production and signaling (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). We also determined that viral protein synthesis in infected normal cells was only 2-4-fold lower compared with infected tumor cells, and the striking difference in CPEs cannot therefore be explained by a preferential shutdown of viral protein synthesis in these normal cells as part of their antiviral response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If these antiviral mechanisms are induced by MV-Edm infection, they will serve to amplify the difference in selectivity conferred by the role of CD46 density in regulating CPEs. However, MV-Edm encodes V and C viral proteins that can respond to the host defense by antagonizing IFN-␣/␤ production and signaling (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). We also determined that viral protein synthesis in infected normal cells was only 2-4-fold lower compared with infected tumor cells, and the striking difference in CPEs cannot therefore be explained by a preferential shutdown of viral protein synthesis in these normal cells as part of their antiviral response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, viruses have evolved diverse strategies to evade or antagonize the IFN antiviral response (11). Thus, measles virus (MV) encodes the V and C accessory proteins that block IFN-␣/␤ production and/or signaling, allowing the virus to replicate in the host cell (12)(13)(14)(15). The mechanism underlying MV-C inhibition of IFN-␣/␤ signaling remains unclear (15), but the MV-V protein blocks the IFN response by inhibiting phosphorylation of signal transducers and activators of transcription 1 and 2 proteins (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most effective route to global suppression would be to shut off the IFN signal transduction pathway through adjacent IFN receptors, such as the JAK/STAT pathway, rather than to inhibit effector molecules such as 2Ј,5Ј-oligoadenylate synthetase and double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase, which are induced by IFN. For example, the measles virus suppresses IFN-␣-induced Jak1 phosphorylation but not IFN-␥-induced Tyr phosphorylation (18), which seems to have a mild effect on host cells. In contrast, the accelerated degradation of STAT1 proteins by the mumps virus seems to have a very severe effect to host cells, causing almost complete suppression of both IFN-␣ and IFN-␥ signal transduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoprecipitation Analysis-Immunoprecipitation was carried out as described previously (18,45). Briefly, cells were lysed in radioimmune precipitation buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 100 mM NaCl, 4 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 g/ml aprotinin, 1 mM Na 3 VO 4 , 1 mM NaF, and 50 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation