1930
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1930.02720010008002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measles Prophylaxis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1931
1931
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. According to our experience, in mass inoculation it is not pos¬ sible to obtain the five day period of exposure because of the varying onset of the time of incubation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. According to our experience, in mass inoculation it is not pos¬ sible to obtain the five day period of exposure because of the varying onset of the time of incubation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferry and Fisher°in 1926 tried to produce active immunity with a toxin-antitoxin which has not gained universal 2. Barenberg 8 and his co-workers failed to get favorable results by this method. Tunnicliff 7 in 1917 tried a diplococcus antimeasles serum to obtain passive immunity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control children in whom bronchopneumonia developed were V/z, 3 and 6 years of age, respectively. 8 Tables 3 and 4 show that complications involving the ear developed in only 5 of the inoculated children, in 4 of whom the measles was mild and in only 1 of whom it was severely toxic. Number of control children with severely toxic measles with complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%