2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8655(03)00146-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

-Means: A new generalized k-means clustering algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This method may not produce fine results whenever the number of clusters is unknown. An improved version of K-means called K*-means has been developed in [24]. It is unable to deal with the noisy data.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method may not produce fine results whenever the number of clusters is unknown. An improved version of K-means called K*-means has been developed in [24]. It is unable to deal with the noisy data.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applied to cluster analysis, the Mean-Shift algorithm is computationally inexpensive and has a non-parametric clustering procedure which does not require prior knowledge of the number of clusters or nodes, nor does it constrain the shape of the clusters. Contrary to the k-means clustering approach [24,43,89], there are no embedded assumptions on the shape and distribution, the number of nodes or clusters. The Mean-Shift algorithm works well on static probability distributions but not as well as dynamic probability distributions such as movies [27].…”
Section: Mean-shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diday [24] used different representatives of the clusters (other than the cluster centers), and the Mahalanobis distance is used instead of the Euclidean distance in [61], [18] and elsewhere.…”
Section: Variants Of the K-means Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17) where Q 1 , Q 2 are positive definite, so that 18) and let the probabilities p k (x i ) and cluster sizes q k be given. If the minimizers c 1 , c 2 of (4.18) do not coincide with any of the data points x i , they are given by…”
Section: Centersmentioning
confidence: 99%