2017
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meaningful Use and Hospital Performance on Post‐Acute Utilization Indicators

Abstract: Hospitals with MU Stage 1 designation did not show significantly higher improvement on post-acute utilization compared to their counterparts without. To achieve gains in quality and safety, potentially associated with EHRs, and to advance care coordination and patient engagement, the regulators should strengthen accountability by linking comprehensive, outcomes-based performance measures to specific MU objectives.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding provides among the strongest evidence supporting the potential for interoperable health information technology to reduce readmissions. Although many hospitals use EHRs as part of their strategy to reduce readmissions, 58 the results of earlier studies generally have not found a relationship between adoption of these systems and readmissions, [59][60][61][62][63][64] with the exception of analyses based on cross-sectional or descriptive study designs. 59,65,66 This study's focus on the general adult patient population, rather than specifically focusing on Medicare beneficiaries, may explain some of the difference in our findings, as has been the case with studies examining the relationship between EHRs and patient safety among a broader adult population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding provides among the strongest evidence supporting the potential for interoperable health information technology to reduce readmissions. Although many hospitals use EHRs as part of their strategy to reduce readmissions, 58 the results of earlier studies generally have not found a relationship between adoption of these systems and readmissions, [59][60][61][62][63][64] with the exception of analyses based on cross-sectional or descriptive study designs. 59,65,66 This study's focus on the general adult patient population, rather than specifically focusing on Medicare beneficiaries, may explain some of the difference in our findings, as has been the case with studies examining the relationship between EHRs and patient safety among a broader adult population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Also similar to CHCs, evidence for the relationship between hospital adoption of EHRs and enhanced EHR capabilities and quality of care is mixed. For example, while Brice and colleagues reported no difference in 30-day readmission rates for hospitals who met meaningful use stage 1 objectives compared to those who did not, 37 Adler-Milstein reported improvements in patient satisfaction and adherence to process measures when comparing performance in hospitals before and after EHR adoption. 38 Limited research has focused on hospitals' use of HIT for providing enabling services and engaging patients or its impact on quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%