2014
DOI: 10.3233/nre-131021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meaningful improvement in walking performance after Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) in chronic spastic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has also been proven by numerous electrophysiological studies indicative of BoNT-related effects within non-injected muscles [19,20,21]. In spastic syndromes, evidence for central effects of BoNT comes from the fact that injection in one muscle may also act at the corresponding antagonist muscle [22,23] or other non-injected muscles with consecutive clinical benefit [18,24]. Interestingly, the time course of pain relief differed from that of muscle relaxation in cervical dystonia (CD) following BoNT injections.…”
Section: Clinical Evidencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This has also been proven by numerous electrophysiological studies indicative of BoNT-related effects within non-injected muscles [19,20,21]. In spastic syndromes, evidence for central effects of BoNT comes from the fact that injection in one muscle may also act at the corresponding antagonist muscle [22,23] or other non-injected muscles with consecutive clinical benefit [18,24]. Interestingly, the time course of pain relief differed from that of muscle relaxation in cervical dystonia (CD) following BoNT injections.…”
Section: Clinical Evidencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Clinical benefit, that is, a wider range of movement at the ankle joint in spastic patients, is present 1 month after BoNT/A injection into the soleus muscle, in spite of little peripheral blockade (Mazzocchio and others 2007). Reduction in knee extensor spasticity is the relevant factor for improving locomotion in spastics following a multiple-muscle BoNT/A injection protocol where, paradoxically, the quadriceps was rarely treated (Cioncoloni and others 2014). These data suggest that BoNT/A, by interacting with spinal circuits, may affect pathological muscle synergies.…”
Section: Functional Significance Of Central Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current understanding of how to improve the efficacy of BoNT/A clinical treatment relies on strategies aimed at improving motor function through optimization of the peripheral effect. For instance, in the treatment of lower limb spasticity a rapid and persistent functional improvement can be obtained if factors such as (1) selection and number of muscles to be simultaneously injected at multiple joints (Cioncoloni and others 2014), possibly by (2) electromyography guide so as to target motor endplate locations (Lapatki and others 2011), alone or (3) combined with short-term electrical nerve stimulation of the injected muscles (Hesse and others 1995) are taken into account.…”
Section: Modulating Pre-motoneuronal Synapsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have reported improvements in walking ability following BoNT‐A injections of the lower limb using a number of assessment techniques, including timed walking tests, Fugl‐Meyer assessments, use of video technology to measure temporospatial parameters, or instrumented insoles, 8,21‐24 with greater improvements in one study when patients underwent an adjunct guided self‐rehabilitation program 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%