2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meaningful choices, political supply, and institutional effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this influence may be contextually reinforced whenever the territorial dimension gains salience in the national political agenda, as is apparently the case in Catalonia since the turn of the millennium, when the level of party polarization along center‐periphery issues––which generally stands above polarization along the left‐right dimension––started to register a sharp increase (Medina, ). Consistent with this speculation, past research at a comparative level has found that party‐system polarization is associated with the diffusion, anchoring, and electoral impact of ideological identities (Freire, ; van der Eijk et al, ; Wessels & Schmitt, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, this influence may be contextually reinforced whenever the territorial dimension gains salience in the national political agenda, as is apparently the case in Catalonia since the turn of the millennium, when the level of party polarization along center‐periphery issues––which generally stands above polarization along the left‐right dimension––started to register a sharp increase (Medina, ). Consistent with this speculation, past research at a comparative level has found that party‐system polarization is associated with the diffusion, anchoring, and electoral impact of ideological identities (Freire, ; van der Eijk et al, ; Wessels & Schmitt, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In the context of elections, ''voice'' can be re-cast to refer to whether an individual was able to participate in the election, and ''equal treatment'' to whether all individuals have equal influence. In addition to these characteristics transported from the judicial context, elections often range in the quantity and quality of alternatives available to individuals (e.g., Diamond 2002;Wessels and Schmitt 2008), and this is directly affected by how candidates are nominated (e.g., Kennedy 2002). Thus, the nature of ''choice'' (captured by nomination processes) may also affect perceptions of electoral fairness.…”
Section: Explanations Of Perceptions Of Election Fairness: Means and mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It relates to voter perceptions of government responsiveness (Kölln et al, 2014) and is reflected in what Downs (1957) has labelled the 'expected party differential', which is defined as 'the difference between the utility income [a citizen] actually received […] and the one he would have received if the opposition had been in power' (Downs, 1957: 40). Understood in a broader sense, this notion of party differentials captures in fact any form of perceived party differences including not only policy, but also perceived differences in performance-based assessments and evaluations of party leaders (see Blais et al, 2000;Wessels and Schmitt, 2008). If they do not believe that government turnover will make a difference, citizens are unlikely to punish incumbents by voting for an opposition party.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%