Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research

Abstract

The current debate about quantitative and qualitative methods focuses on whether there is a necessary connection between method-type and research paradigm that makes the different approaches incompatible. This paper argues that part of the connection is rhetorical. Quantitative methods express the assumptions of a positvisit paradigm which holds that behavior can be explained through objective facts. Design and instrumentation persuade by showing how bias and error are eliminated. Qualitative methods express the assumptions of a phenomenological paradigm that there are multiple realities that are socially defined. Rich description persuades by showing that the researcher was immersed in the setting and giving the reader enough detail to “make sense” of the situation. While rhetorically different, the results of the two methodologies can be complementary. Examples are drawn from two studies using different methodologies to study the same problem.

Influência do Protocolo Agroambiental na Gestão Ambiental de Indústrias do Setor Sucroenergético da Microrregião de Assis/SP: Um Estudo de Múltiplos Casos

“…A pesquisa qualitativa é especialmente útil em pesquisas acadêmicas cujo objetivo é o entendimento dos contornos de um fenômeno específico em seu contexto particular (Firestone, 1986;Weed-Nederhof, 2001;Eriksson et Kovalainen, 2008;Lach, 2014), sendo indicada para pesquisas exploratórias (Myers, 2009). …”

Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: A study of Irish software product companies

“…The two research paradigms that have received most attention in the literature can be broadly labelled as positivist and phenomenological [37] or positivist and interpretivist [5]. The most commonly used terms to differentiate these paradigms with respect to their associated methods and techniques, are quantitative and qualitative respectively, with quantitative methods being based on the positivist paradigm while qualitative methods are built on a phenomenological worldview [13,17].…”

Alternative Arguments for Generalizing from Data as Applied to Qualitative Research

“…Qualitative research focuses on up-close observation of behavior in settings as well as interviewing people in those settings and collecting and analyzing documents and artifacts. Its purposes are to describe those settings and understand the definitions of those settings held by people in them (Firestone, 1987;Van Maanen, 1982). The emphasis on upclose description fits nicely with an interest in cases, but there are traditions in qualitative research in which the case becomes difficult to identify and delimit (Strauss & Corbin, 1990) as well as case studies that are largely quantitative.…”