1986
DOI: 10.1080/0742-969x.1986.11882574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meaning and Purpose in Life: Assessment Techniques of Logotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The PIL has been psychometrically reviewed in a number of sources (e.g., Crumbaugh & Henrion, 1988; Hutzell, 1987a, 1988; Melton & Schulenberg, 2008; Reker, 2000; Schulenberg, 2004a). With regard to validity, the PIL, as is expected, correlates positively with constructs such as happiness, emotional stability, and extroversion, and negatively with constructs such as boredom proneness, anxiety, and depression (Hutzell, 1988, 1989; Melton & Schulenberg, 2007, 2008; Robak & Griffin, 2000; Schulenberg, 2004a). Such correlations are consistent with logotherapy conceptualizations and research studies that demonstrate the relationship between meaning and well-being (Melton & Schulenberg, 2008; Schulenberg, 2004a).…”
Section: Psychometric Assessment Of the Meaning Constructmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The PIL has been psychometrically reviewed in a number of sources (e.g., Crumbaugh & Henrion, 1988; Hutzell, 1987a, 1988; Melton & Schulenberg, 2008; Reker, 2000; Schulenberg, 2004a). With regard to validity, the PIL, as is expected, correlates positively with constructs such as happiness, emotional stability, and extroversion, and negatively with constructs such as boredom proneness, anxiety, and depression (Hutzell, 1988, 1989; Melton & Schulenberg, 2007, 2008; Robak & Griffin, 2000; Schulenberg, 2004a). Such correlations are consistent with logotherapy conceptualizations and research studies that demonstrate the relationship between meaning and well-being (Melton & Schulenberg, 2008; Schulenberg, 2004a).…”
Section: Psychometric Assessment Of the Meaning Constructmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…selections were made: one item from the 20 item Life Purpose Questionnaire [54], eight from the eight item Constructed Meaning Scale [18], three from the 28 item Life Regard Index [8], three from the 20 item Meaning in Suffering Test [16], 12 from the 12 item The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [27], two from the six item Satisfaction With Illness Scale [55], and nine from the 20 item Spiritual Well-Being Scale [56]. When administered, the item stem, ''As a result of my cancer diagnosis and treatment...'' was used to focus the respondent and take a developmental perspective and reflect on the significance of the cancer experience with respect to meaning.…”
Section: Item Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may be the positive value that one assigns to one's own life (Garfield, 1973;Hutzell, 1986;Reker & Wong, 1988). Feelings of harmony and integration with life may be important to this dimension (Paloutzian & Ellison, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%