2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meandering Morphodynamics: Insights from Laboratory and Numerical Experiments and Beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This motion of sediment is due to the established secondary currents in bends. Previous studies [8,10,15] have already focused on the The morphological changes are also analyzed along a bend of the sinuous channel. The variations in an alluvial bed are visible in the channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This motion of sediment is due to the established secondary currents in bends. Previous studies [8,10,15] have already focused on the The morphological changes are also analyzed along a bend of the sinuous channel. The variations in an alluvial bed are visible in the channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanders are systems that are constantly changing, following a sinusoidal pattern, and playing an important role in the modelling and shaping of the landscape around them. These beautiful patterns have been the object of study of many researchers in diverse areas in the last 50 years [34][35][36][37][38]. Two main processes in meander migration are bank erosion and bank accretion [34,35,39].…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SF, Youden's J only increases by 5.3% when varying parameter values spatially, which suggests more homogeneous soil characteristics at the SF field site, relative to MC. The suggestion to integrate floodplain heterogeneity into planform evolution models [26] would not only serve in improving the fit between observations and simulation results but would make the model more independent of input parameter values; the parameter set would remain valid throughout a simulation. However, care is required to avoid overfitting a model, which would otherwise compromise its capacity to be validated against a second dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous laboratory studies also used cohesive substrate, such as clay (e.g., [21][22][23]). However, most modelling (e.g., [4,24]) and flume-based studies (e.g., [25,26]) on meandering rivers involve sand beds and banks, whereas the meandering process typically occurs in cohesive floodplains [27]. In particular, the mechanisms responsible for the development of meandering channels in a laboratory channel (e.g., [2]) may differ from those observed in nature, even if these channels share similar physiological traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%