1966
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1966)005<0219:mwsmit>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean Wind Speed Measurements in Turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This overspeeding phenomenon, and the various effects contributing to it, were first reviewed comprehensively by MacCready (1966). He showed that one of the error causes, which he called 'data processing error' and which is denoted here by EQ, is independent of cup characteristics.…”
Section: Appendix Cup Anemometer Overspeeding At Bedford and At Kansasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overspeeding phenomenon, and the various effects contributing to it, were first reviewed comprehensively by MacCready (1966). He showed that one of the error causes, which he called 'data processing error' and which is denoted here by EQ, is independent of cup characteristics.…”
Section: Appendix Cup Anemometer Overspeeding At Bedford and At Kansasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The differences in the results could be attributed to one or a combination of the following: (a) errors associated with measuring wind speeds on the site using cuprotation anemometers, due to the response time of the rotating cups to sudden changes in wind speed and direction (MacCready, 1966;Sarre, 1989); (b) a need to have anemometers or other types of wind measurements mounted much closer to the surface, i.e., about half a meter, to ensure that the shear velocity determinations are taken only within the constant stress layer of the wind profiledunfortunately, all wind measurements were taken from fixed heights and there was no preplanned methodology to measure u * ; (c) considering hourly wind speed average may affect the threshold shear velocity during the sampling period; i.e., gusts can initiate sand movement despite the mean velocity remaining below the threshold value; (d) errors resulting from interference of the air flow caused by the trap (Horikawa and Shen, 1960;Cermak et al, 1982), and by not being perfectly aligned to the desired direction; and (e) unsteady state in the field owing to wind fluctuations in nature, in addition to that the wind profiles used in this study were not corrected for stability effects due to a thermal stratification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors associated with measuring wind speeds on the site using cup-rotation anemometers, due to the response time of the rotating cups to sudden changes in wind speed and direction (MacCready 1966;Sarre 1988) or due to ignoring the bounce effects. 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%