2003
DOI: 10.1081/sta-120025385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean Squared Error Matrix Comparisons of Some Biased Estimators in Linear Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easily seen from (4) and (12) thatγ (D) andγ JGLE (D) are always biased estimators of γ . Akdeniz and Erol (2003) defined the variances of the GLE and JGLE as…”
Section: The Model Gle and Jglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easily seen from (4) and (12) thatγ (D) andγ JGLE (D) are always biased estimators of γ . Akdeniz and Erol (2003) defined the variances of the GLE and JGLE as…”
Section: The Model Gle and Jglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sakallıoǧlu et al (2001) have dealt with the comparisons among the RE, Liu estimator and iteration estimator constructed as alternatives to the LSE when multicollinearity is present. Akdeniz and Erol (2003) have compared the almost unbiased generalized ridge estimator with the almost unbiased generalized Liu estimator in the mean squared error matrix (MSEM) sense. Sakallıooǧlu and Kaçıranlar (2008) have obtained a new biased estimator and compared it with the LSE, Liu estimator, and two Liu-type estimators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data was discussed in Gruber [19], and the data has been analysed by Akdeniz and Erol [20], Li and Yang [21] and among others. Now we assemble the data as fol- Table 2, it can be observed that the predictors behave differently than the respective estimators, which is also agreed with our theoretical findings.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%