2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean square exponential stability of uncertain stochastic delayed neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
110
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by our Theorem 3.3 and using Matlab LMI Toolbox, for h 1 = 0 it is found that the equilibrium solution of uncertain stochastic neural networks (1) is robustly exponentially stable in mean square for any arbitrarily large h 2 (as long as numerical computation reliable). Therefore, for this example, the results given in this paper are less conservative than those in [29] and [3]. …”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, by our Theorem 3.3 and using Matlab LMI Toolbox, for h 1 = 0 it is found that the equilibrium solution of uncertain stochastic neural networks (1) is robustly exponentially stable in mean square for any arbitrarily large h 2 (as long as numerical computation reliable). Therefore, for this example, the results given in this paper are less conservative than those in [29] and [3]. …”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This shows that the established results in this paper is finer than the previous results since the stability region is valid upto the upper bound 4.4690 instead of 2.2471 in [29]. In order to compare the results in this paper with those in [3,29], we assume that the activation functions satisfy (A2) with c 1 = c 2 = c 3 = 0 andc 1 = 1.2,c 2 = 0.5,c 3 = 1.3. When the time-varying delay is differentiable and μ = 0.85, by using Theorem 3.1 in this paper, Theorem 1 in [29] and Theorem 1 in [3], we obtain the maximum allowable upper bound of τ (t) as h 2 = 9.7377, h = 9.6876, and h = 7.7377, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations