2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-016-4207-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean shift and log-polar transform for road sign detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the performance of its method degrades when there exists low image contrast or various illumination conditions. Note that, the method in [37], [21] and [33] performs comparably with the method in [8], with a slight improvement. Because the dataset contains more mandatory road signs, the performance of the method in [23] drops slightly.…”
Section: Road Sign Detection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the performance of its method degrades when there exists low image contrast or various illumination conditions. Note that, the method in [37], [21] and [33] performs comparably with the method in [8], with a slight improvement. Because the dataset contains more mandatory road signs, the performance of the method in [23] drops slightly.…”
Section: Road Sign Detection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In order to demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed algorithm, we compare the performance of our algorithm with those of the state-of-the-art approaches on three benchmarking datasets and a newly collected dataset. These approaches include the SVM approach proposed in [26], the approach integrating object detection with 3D tracking in [37], the Fourier descriptors in [21], the ROI extraction and histogram features-based method in [23], the image segmentation and shape analysis method in [20], Mean shift and log-polar transform [8], fast R-CNN method [33] and the RST approach [24]. Detection rate (Hits), false alarm rate (FA) and average processing time are compared.…”
Section: Road Sign Detection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations