2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3869-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean-Risk Analysis: An Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first explore the case where the agents have the MV objective and then we consider the case where the agents have the MDR objective. We explore these two objectives because they are widely explored and even claimed to be equivalent (Choi & Chiu, 2012), but we find that this is not the case in the sense that the Pareto‐optimal solutions have different structures under these two objectives.…”
Section: Challenges Of Using Po Criterion: Pareto Optimality and Cont...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We first explore the case where the agents have the MV objective and then we consider the case where the agents have the MDR objective. We explore these two objectives because they are widely explored and even claimed to be equivalent (Choi & Chiu, 2012), but we find that this is not the case in the sense that the Pareto‐optimal solutions have different structures under these two objectives.…”
Section: Challenges Of Using Po Criterion: Pareto Optimality and Cont...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A number of studies have concentrated on risk-averse behavior in supply chains by employing the following three typical methods, namely, value-at-risk (VaR, see the pioneering work by Luciano et al ( 2003 ) and Tapiero ( 2005 )), conditional value-at-risk (CVaR, see Wu et al ( 2006 )), and mean–variance (MV, see Chiu and Choi ( 2016 ), Wang et al ( 2019 ), Choi et al ( 2020 )). Choi and Chiu ( 2012 ) provide a comprehensive review on risk analysis employing VaR, CVaR, and MV in stochastic supply chains and demonstrate that risk aversion is commonly incorporated in supply chains management studies without financial constraint. However, few studies on supply chain management considering members’ risk aversion when facing financial constraint have been conducted.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2009), value‐at‐risk (VaR) (Chiu and Choi 2010, Kouvelis and Li 2018, Park et al. 2017), and mean‐risk objectives (Chen and Federgruen 2000, Choi and Chiu 2012) have been proposed. In particular, the mean‐variance (MV) objective is very popular owing to its nice structural properties, as well as the intuitive meanings behind the mean and variance (Chiu et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%