2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean pressure distributions around a circular cylinder in the branch of a T-junction with/without vanes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chuang and Y.M. Ferng [38,39], and Wu et al [40] In their research, the phenomena of the backflow occurred when M R ≤ 0.05, M R ≤ 0.062, M R ≤ 0.06, and M R ≤ 0.05, respectively. The difference may be the limit of observation methods in the experiment regarding the inadequate sensitivity of temperature sensors.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Backflow In the Teementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Chuang and Y.M. Ferng [38,39], and Wu et al [40] In their research, the phenomena of the backflow occurred when M R ≤ 0.05, M R ≤ 0.062, M R ≤ 0.06, and M R ≤ 0.05, respectively. The difference may be the limit of observation methods in the experiment regarding the inadequate sensitivity of temperature sensors.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Backflow In the Teementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several papers about simplified T-junction models of the vents of high-speed trains have been published by the members of our group. They mainly focused on the distribution and high-order statistics of the velocity in cross ducts, as well as the distribution of pressure in branch ducts [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Atzori et al [ 24 ] studied the coherent structure of a square duct, and the results showed that the large-scale structure attached to a horizontal wall has the same size as that of a vertical wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure9: Comparison of pressure distribution on the circular cylinder due to Newtonian, Shear thinning, Shear thickening fluid flow using LBM studies, and the literature Wu et al[25] and Bertin and Smith[24] along with potential fluid flow, i.e., C p = 1 − 4 sin 2 (θ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%